Race Is On to Pin Blame For High Health-Care Costs

Who’s to blame for rising healthcare costs, insurers or providers, such as doctors or hospitals?  Depending who you ask, either side places the blame on the other.  Whether it’s insurers’ trying to meet the bottom line and remain profitable or physicians and hospitals attempting to increase revenue and improve their margins, one thing is for certain: Healthcare costs continue to rise.

Read on to determine where the blame lies.

By AVERY JOHNSON

A battle over who to blame for rising health-care costs is escalating, as groups seek to pin the problem on each other and say none of the health-care legislation under consideration does enough to solve it. U.S. spending on health care reached $2.5 trillion in 2009, according to federal estimates. It is expected to jump to $4.5 trillion in 10 years.

Insurers contend that they must pass on ever-higher bills from hospitals and doctors. Hospitals say they are struggling with more uninsured patients, demands by doctors for top salaries, and underpayments from Medicare and Medicaid.

And doctors say they are strong-armed by insurance monopolies and hampered by medical malpractice costs.

In the rush to point fingers, few solutions are emerging.

“It’s always someone else’s fault,” said Robert Laszewski, president of health-care consulting firm Health Policy & Strategy Associates. “There is not an incentive for these people to cooperate because the game they are all playing is getting a bigger piece of the pie.”

The issue has come into sharp relief as WellPoint Inc. has sought to defend its plan to raise some prices in California by up to 39%.

In a hearing Wednesday on Capitol Hill, WellPoint Chief Executive Angela Braly singled out dominant hospital systems for demanding 40% rate increases and drug companies for roughly 20% profit margins.

A WellPoint spokeswoman said that at least one hospital had asked for a 220% payment increase.

Many Democrats have cited lack of competition among insurers as a driver of higher prices. On Wednesday, the House of Representatives voted to repeal a longstanding insurance-industry exemption from federal antitrust laws. The bill now heads to the Senate, where its future is less certain.

Doctors complain of a lack of competition among insurers, as well.

A report by the American Medical Association this week argues that 500 insurance-company mergers in the past 12 years have led to markets dominated by one or two health plans.

This year, two insurers control 70% of the market in 24 states, up from 18 last year, the report said.

“There is no other company for doctors to go to” when an insurer comes to them with terms that they find unfavorable, said AMA President James Rohack. But insurers say is it doctors and hospitals that have gotten too powerful through consolidation.

A study published Thursday in the journal Health Affairs appears to back up their point, saying that insurers are weakened in their negotiations by their inability to exclude prominent doctors and hospitals from networks.

Authors from the Center for Studying Health System Change, a nonpartisan research group, conducted 300 interviews with California doctors and hospital and insurance executives in late 2008.

The study said two big networks of providers now dominate the northern part of the state: Sutter Health owns two dozen California hospitals and medical centers, and Catholic Healthcare West runs 33 hospitals.

In addition, the study said, doctors who are increasingly banding together for negotiating power are commanding yearly double-digit payment increases.

Hospitals and doctors shot back that the study was largely anecdotal and said integration improved efficiency.

Catholic Healthcare West said it took on $1.5 billion in bad debt from government underpayments last year; its size, it added, makes it possible to achieve some savings.

Sutter Health said increases in its reimbursement rates from private insurers have been in the single digits.

“We are doing our best to keep costs down because these health-care premium increases are not sustainable,” said Bill Gleeson, vice president of communications a Sutter Health.

Read More

Health Costs Are Crushing Small Businesses

WSJ. – The Magazine from the Wall Street Journal

By MARY LANDRIEU

Read about Senator Landrieu and her commitment to small business owners to make health care more affordable to the 27 million small businesses in this country. As a service provider to many small companies, Medical Cost Advocate is all too familiar with the many challenges faced by small businesses in navigating the health care maze. Small business owners should reach out to consumer directed health care service providers as self service allies for their employees.

After years of struggling with costs that were eating into his bottom line, David White, a small business owner in Maine, recently dropped health insurance for himself and his employees. It was a nerve-wracking decision. “I just hope my people or I don’t get sick,” he told a small business advocacy group.

Louise Hardaway wasn’t willing to take the same risk. Health-care costs forced her to close her small business in Tennessee. Factor 4 Life was, ironically, a business that helped people navigate the health-insurance system!

Unfortunately, these stories are not unique. As chairwoman of the Senate Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship, I hear about a lot of business owners hit hard by health-care costs. These costs not only eat into profits, they prevent small businesses from hiring more workers.

Small firms, defined as less than 500 employees, pump almost a trillion dollars into the economy each year, create two-thirds of our nation’s new jobs annually, and account for more than half of America’s work force. But too much of their money is going toward high health premiums that are increasing faster than the prices of the products and services they provide—four times faster than the rate of inflation since 2001, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation.

Nationwide, small firms will spend $156 billion on health premiums this year. In place of those high premiums, small business owners could employ 10 million additional workers—the entire state of Michigan—at minimum wage for a year.

Unless something is done, annual health-care costs for small firms over the next 10 years are expected to more than double to reach $339 billion in 2018. As those costs increase, the burden will get heavier and force many of them to lay off workers. The Small Business Majority, an advocacy group, estimates that over the next decade about 943,000 small business jobs will be lost.

Today, there are already 14.9 million people unemployed in America. We don’t need to add to those ranks, instead we need to help small businesses create more jobs. The path we are on now is unacceptable and unsustainable.

Small businesses want to provide health coverage to their workers, but when faced with cutting employees or cutting insurance, the insurance is the first to go. In 1993, 61% of all small companies offered health coverage. Today that number is less than 38%.

Employers who can afford to provide health coverage are providing it because they are competing with big businesses that offer quality health-care choices for top talent. Businesses not offering coverage are often small, low-wage firms that can’t afford it. There are 27 million small businesses in America, 22 million of which are sole proprietorships. And it is often sole proprietors that have trouble affording health insurance.

Insurance premiums for sole-proprietors are up 74% since 2001. This has made health insurance even harder to afford. And while big firms can deduct health premiums on their federal tax returns, under current tax rules sole proprietors often cannot. This forces them, on average, to pay nearly $2,000 more a year in taxes than they otherwise would have to pay. That is money they could use to buy new computer equipment or other things necessary to keep a business running efficiently.

The additional tax burden that sole proprietors have to pay has not yet been addressed by proposed health-care reforms. To keep our economy healthy we must keep our small businesses healthy, and that begins with stable, affordable health insurance.

I am committed to working with my Senate colleagues and the Obama administration to ensure that the health-care reforms our small businesses desperately need are passed. Small businesses—and all Americans—can’t go another pay check without meaningful reform.

Ms. Landrieu, a Democrat, is a U.S. senator from Louisiana.


Read More